logo

Secularism does not happen by law, change of attitude is needed

Online Desk

Published:27 Mar 2021, 11:30 AM

Secularism does not happen by law, change of attitude is needed


Christian land Europe has had to walk a long way to become secular. When the Catholic Church assumes the monstrous form of money-land-prestige for the welfare of the people, then the conflict with the state is at stake. The violence of the church was so great that the state itself became the subjects of the church. At one stage the conflict between the church and the church became inevitable. In parallel, a bloody war broke out between different sects of Christianity over the sharing of money. 

In this war alone, in the 30 years from 1818 to 1848, the population of Germany and Central Europe declined by 25 to 40 percent. In the German state of Ottemberg, the population has dropped by 75 percent. So it turns out that in a country where 100 percent of the population is of the same religion, secularism is needed. Because a religion has different sects, Everyone thinks that everyone's madhhab is correct and wants to apply its principles. As a result, conflict became inevitable. The modern state is inhabited by people of many races and religions. As a result, innumerable religious groups were formed. Is there any alternative to secularism in the state system to stop the bloodshed among them?

Many will now argue that the UK has no written constitution and that the UK is not a secular state by law. When the king or queen assumes the responsibility of head of state, he has to swear that he will defend the religion of the Church of England, because the religion of the Church of England is the state religion of England. In the House of Lords, there are 26 unelected priests who can oppose the passage of the law if they do not like it. 

But the reality is that although the UK is not constitutionally secular, I do not know if there is any other country in the world that has as much neutrality and freedom as the UK has at the individual level. Here we can say that all the freedoms of the citizens depend not only on the law, but also on the rule of law. In short, The basis of secularism in the UK is human culture that teaches respect for the views of others. The constitution of a large democratic India is 100% secular and secular. Yet why the religious riots and ethnic strife there? This is because of the failure of the state to establish the rule of law and justice. 

The socio-economic status of Muslims in India is much lower than that of the caste Hindus and the majority Muslim community in Bangladesh is forcing the minority community to seek refuge in India by establishing a reign of terror on various pretexts. In Bangladesh as in India, the socio-economic position of the minority community is declining. Although the constitutions of the two countries are secular, the minorities are being deprived due to lack of rule of law and people's point of view and are not coming under the rule of law. 


The socio-economic situation is far below and the majority Muslim community in Bangladesh is forcing the minority community to take refuge in India by establishing a reign of terror on various pretexts. In Bangladesh as in India, the socio-economic position of the minority community is declining. Although the constitutions of the two countries are secular, the minorities are being deprived due to lack of rule of law and people's point of view and are not coming under the rule of law. The socio-economic situation is far below and the majority Muslim community in Bangladesh is forcing the minority community to take refuge in India by establishing a reign of terror on various pretexts. In Bangladesh as in India, the socio-economic position of the minority community is declining. Although the constitutions of the two countries are secular, the minorities are being deprived due to lack of rule of law and people's point of view and are not coming under the rule of law.

Many drag Buddhism, the religion of peace, into state unrest. It is not only Islam that executes apostates, our great Ashoka did the same. All the mainstream religions of the world are extremely cruel to the unbelievers. The Catholic Church executed those who did not believe in the Spanish Inquisition Catholic doctrine. According to the Buddhist text Ashoka Badan, Emperor Ashoka was so excited to hear Gautama Buddha in a text of a Buddhist sect called 'Ajibik' being shown bowing to Mahavira, the founder of Jainism, that he sentenced all the Ajibikas of Punduvardhana to death. 16,000 Ajibik were brutally killed in North Bengal.

We would not have had to drink the water of twelve ghats if the speech of Jinnah, the father of the tailed Pakistan, as the husband of the Constituent Assembly on August 11 had been properly implemented, even as a result of his speech Jinnah said that day, "You can go freely to your temple-mosque-church or any shrine in this independent state of Pakistan." You can be a follower of any caste or ideology, we are equal citizens of one state, there is no opposition to this policy. Religion is everyone's personal belief, as a citizen of the state, there will be no Hindu-Hindu politically, no Muslim-Muslim. ” His disciples would have responded to his call if he had not turned religion into opium. But he had already lost the moral character of his faith. 

Following this, the constitution of independent Bangladesh has been trampled underfoot by the uniformed people after the safari, although the end result has not been good for anyone. The sooner our kingdom understands this truth, the better. And the most unpleasant truth is that secularism needs to be tolerant democracy, it does not need to be established by law in a country where there is true democracy. In the absence of democracy, secularism is not possible without legislation. Pakistan could not, not in Bangladesh, not in India. In a country where there is true democracy, there is no need to establish it by law. In the absence of democracy, secularism is not possible without legislation. Pakistan could not, not in Bangladesh, not in India. In a country where there is true democracy, there is no need to establish it by law. In the absence of democracy, secularism is not possible without legislation. Pakistan could not, not in Bangladesh, not in India.

The article was written by Mohamed Rubel, Vienna expatriate